biology: be more difficult than physics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.60
Siblings mathematics
Weight: 0.37
, ecology
Weight: 0.36
, physics
Weight: 0.36
, quantum physics
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more difficult than physics 1.00
be similar to physics 0.87
be harder than chemistry 0.83
be more more dependent than chemistry 0.79
be better than chemistry 0.78
is difficult 0.78
be more more dependent on chemistry 0.77
stand on shoulders of physics 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(computer science, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(physics, is difficult)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(physics, be better than chemistry)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(computer science, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(physics, be harder than chemistry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(physics, be better than chemistry)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(physics, be better than chemistry)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(physics, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(physics, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(biology, be similar to physics)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biology, be similar to physics)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(biology, be harder than chemistry)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more more dependent than chemistry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(biology, be better than chemistry)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(biology, be similar to physics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more more dependent on chemistry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(biology, be similar to physics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(biology, stand on shoulders of physics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be more more dependent than chemistry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(biology, be more more dependent than chemistry)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(biology, be harder than chemistry)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biology, stand on shoulders of physics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(biology, be more more dependent on chemistry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(biology, be more more dependent than chemistry)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(biology, stand on shoulders of physics)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(biology, be more more dependent on chemistry)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(biology, be better than chemistry)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(biology, be more more dependent on chemistry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(biology, be harder than chemistry)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(biology, be harder than chemistry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(biology, be better than chemistry)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(biology, be better than chemistry)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(biology, stand on shoulders of physics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(physics, be better than chemistry)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(physics, be harder than chemistry)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(physics, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(biology, be more difficult than physics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)