birch: be white bark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.77
, species
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.66
, hardwood
Weight: 0.59
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.40
, oak tree
Weight: 0.40
, oak
Weight: 0.39
, beech
Weight: 0.39
, maple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be white bark 1.00
have white bark 1.00
have bark 0.95
was bark 0.94
has color white 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tree, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, be white bark)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hardwood, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, be white bark)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wood, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, be white bark)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(wood, has color white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hardwood, has color white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(tree, has color white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(wood, has color white)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(hardwood, has color white)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(tree, has color white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(tree, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(birch, be white bark)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hardwood, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(birch, be white bark)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(wood, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(birch, be white bark)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(birch, be white bark)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(birch, was bark)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(birch, have bark)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, have white bark)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(birch, was bark)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(birch, have bark)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birch, was bark)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(birch, have white bark)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(birch, have white bark)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(birch, have bark)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(birch, has color white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(birch, has color white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(birch, have white bark)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(birch, has color white)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(birch, has color white)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(birch, was bark)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(birch, have bark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, be white bark)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wood, has color white)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hardwood, has color white)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, has color white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wood, has color white)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(hardwood, has color white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(birch, be white bark) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(tree, has color white)