birch: was bark

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.77
, species
Weight: 0.69
, wood
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.66
, hardwood
Weight: 0.59
Siblings maple tree
Weight: 0.40
, oak tree
Weight: 0.40
, oak
Weight: 0.39
, beech
Weight: 0.39
, maple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
was bark 1.00
have bark 0.98
be white bark 0.94
have white bark 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(birch, was bark)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(birch, be white bark)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(birch, have white bark)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(birch, have bark)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(birch, have bark)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(birch, have bark)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(birch, have bark)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(birch, be white bark)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(birch, have white bark)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(birch, be white bark)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(birch, have white bark)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, be white bark)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(birch, have white bark)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(birch, was bark)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(birch, was bark) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(birch, was bark)