bird: has physical part wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dead bird
Weight: 0.67
, chicken
Weight: 0.66
, wildlife
Weight: 0.65
, hobby
Weight: 0.65
Siblings peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.85
, wren
Weight: 0.77
, heron
Weight: 0.77
, owl
Weight: 0.76
, great horned owl
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wings 1.00
need wings 0.89
has physical part feet 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chicken, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(chicken, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(bird, has physical part wings)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bird, need wings)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(bird, need wings)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bird, need wings)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(bird, need wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chicken, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chicken, has physical part wings)