blackberry: be good for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.70
, smartphone
Weight: 0.68
, phone
Weight: 0.68
, fruit
Weight: 0.65
Siblings raspberry
Weight: 0.37
, blueberry
Weight: 0.36
, pear
Weight: 0.36
, cellular phone
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for dogs 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(raspberry, be bad for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(blueberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blueberry, be good for dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(raspberry, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(raspberry, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(blackberry, be good for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(blackberry, be bad for dogs)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(blackberry, be bad for dogs)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(blackberry, be bad for dogs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be bad for dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(blackberry, be good for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(raspberry, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(blackberry, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(blueberry, be good for dogs)