blueberry: be bad for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.70
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.70
, berry
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.65
Siblings strawberry
Weight: 0.39
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for dogs 1.00
be good for dogs 0.97
be toxic to cats 0.79
be good for babies 0.77
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(strawberry, be good for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for babies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pear, be good for babies)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for babies)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(strawberry, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(strawberry, be good for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(blueberry, be bad for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be good for dogs)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(blueberry, be good for dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be good for babies)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(blueberry, be good for babies)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(blueberry, be good for dogs)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(blueberry, be good for dogs)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(blueberry, be good for babies)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(blueberry, be good for babies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(blueberry, be bad for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(strawberry, be good for dogs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pear, be good for babies)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)