pear: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
go bad 0.80
be good for children 0.80
is really expensive 0.80
has quality good 0.80
be good in water 0.79
be good for heart 0.79
be good for dogs 0.78
be good for body 0.78
be good for young children 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(grape, be good for dogs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grape, be good for body)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(grape, be good for dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(grape, be good for dogs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(grape, be good for body)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(grape, be good for body)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(pear, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(pear, be good for body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for body)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(pear, be good for body)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(pear, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(grape, be good for dogs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(grape, be good for body)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(pear, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)