fruit: be good in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good in water 1.00
have water 0.91
be good for people 0.81
has quality good 0.80
float in water 0.78
be good for human body 0.76
be good for heart 0.76
has quality bad 0.76
contain water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, have water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(apple, be good for people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apple, float in water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fig, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(peach, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, contain water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(watermelon, have water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(watermelon, have water)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pear, float in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(watermelon, contain water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(watermelon, contain water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(apple, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(apple, float in water)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(peach, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(peach, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(apple, be good for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(apple, be good for people)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fig, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fig, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(apple, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(watermelon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(watermelon, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, be good in water)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, have water)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, have water)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fruit, float in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fruit, float in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit, float in water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(fruit, have water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fruit, contain water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, contain water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fruit, be good for human body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fruit, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for human body)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, float in water)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, contain water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for human body)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for human body)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fruit, be good for heart)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fruit, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(watermelon, have water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pear, float in water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, be good for people)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(apple, float in water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fig, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(peach, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(watermelon, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(watermelon, contain water)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)