fruit: contain water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
contain water 1.00
contain sugar 0.85
have water 0.80
ordinarily contain seeds 0.76
be good in water 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, contain water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, have water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(watermelon, contain water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(watermelon, contain water)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(watermelon, have water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(watermelon, have water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(fruit, contain water)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fruit, have water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fruit, have water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(fruit, have water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, be good in water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, contain water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(watermelon, contain water)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, contain water)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(watermelon, have water)