pear: float in water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit tree
Weight: 0.75
, flavor
Weight: 0.72
, fruit
Weight: 0.69
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.58
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.42
, apple tree
Weight: 0.40
, peach tree
Weight: 0.40
, grape
Weight: 0.39
, crab apple
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
float in water 1.00
float in soda 0.86
be good in water 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fruit, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pear, float in water)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pear, float in water)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(fruit, float in water)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fruit, float in water)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(fruit, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pear, float in water)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fruit, be good in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pear, float in water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pear, float in water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pear, float in water)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, float in water)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fruit, float in water)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(pear, float in water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)