fruit: be good for heart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for heart 1.00
be good for people 0.80
be good for human body 0.76
be good in water 0.76
has quality good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fig, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(apple, be good for people)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(peach, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(apple, be good for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(apple, be good for people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(peach, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(peach, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fig, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fig, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(apple, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(watermelon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(watermelon, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fruit, be good for heart)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, be good in water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(fruit, be good for human body)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for human body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for human body)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for human body)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fruit, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fig, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(peach, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, be good for people)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(watermelon, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, has quality good)