fruit: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.66
, material
Weight: 0.62
, snack
Weight: 0.62
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.61
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.69
, apple
Weight: 0.67
, watermelon
Weight: 0.67
, peach
Weight: 0.67
, fig
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be good in water 0.80
be good for people 0.79
be good for heart 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(watermelon, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(fig, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(peach, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(apple, be good for people)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(peach, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(peach, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(fig, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(fig, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(apple, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(watermelon, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(watermelon, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(apple, be good for people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(apple, be good for people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(fruit, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(fruit, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(fruit, be good in water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good in water)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(fruit, be good in water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(fruit, be good for heart)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for heart)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for heart)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for heart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(fig, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(peach, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(watermelon, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, be good for people)