apple: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.67
, flavor
Weight: 0.65
, dessert
Weight: 0.65
, deciduous tree
Weight: 0.64
Siblings apple pie
Weight: 0.74
, crab apple
Weight: 0.74
, cherry
Weight: 0.65
, apple juice
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be good for people 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(crab apple, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cherry, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(cherry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(cherry, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(crab apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(crab apple, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(apple, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(apple, be good for people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(apple, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(apple, be good for people)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(apple, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(apple, be good for people)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(apple, be good for people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(apple, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cherry, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(crab apple, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(apple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)