apple juice: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents juice
Weight: 0.79
, drink
Weight: 0.74
, fruit
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, soft drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings tomato juice
Weight: 0.43
, carrot juice
Weight: 0.42
, grape juice
Weight: 0.42
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.42
, lime juice
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
go bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(food, go bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(juice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(juice, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(food, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grape juice, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carrot juice, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(food, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(grape juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grape juice, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(carrot juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(carrot juice, is quality)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(apple juice, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(apple juice, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(apple juice, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(apple juice, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(apple juice, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(apple juice, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(juice, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grape juice, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(carrot juice, is quality)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(juice, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(food, go bad)