soft drink: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
be bad for health 0.77
be bad for us 0.76
is best 0.76
take shape of solid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(orange juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(orange juice, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is best)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soft drink, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(orange juice, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(coca cola, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best)