diet coke: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worse 0.87
has quality change 0.86
be bad for health 0.81
is zero bad 0.76
be bad losing 0.75
be bad on keto 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(drink, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(drink, be bad for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(soda, be bad for health)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(soda, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(soda, be bad for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(diet coke, be bad losing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad losing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality change)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad losing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diet coke, be bad on keto)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad losing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad on keto)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad on keto)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad on keto)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(soda, be bad for health)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drink, be bad for health)