soft drink: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad for health 0.81
be bad for us 0.80
be bad for body 0.76
be bad losing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad losing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad losing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad losing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(orange juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(orange juice, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for health)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for body)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for body)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(soft drink, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(orange juice, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad losing)