soft drink: be bad for body

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for body 1.00
be bad for us 0.79
be bad for teeth 0.79
be bad for health 0.78
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for teeth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for body)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for health)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for body)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for teeth)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for body) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)