soft drink: be bad for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.78
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.76
, snack
Weight: 0.71
, liquid
Weight: 0.70
Siblings bottled water
Weight: 0.74
, coca cola
Weight: 0.74
, orange juice
Weight: 0.71
, diet coke
Weight: 0.71
, apple juice
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for us 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
be bad for body 0.79
be bad for health 0.78
be bad for teeth 0.77
has quality good 0.76
be important for life 0.76
take up then solid more space 0.76
be bad for plants 0.75
take up then solid space 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(liquid, take up then solid space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(liquid, take up then solid space)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(liquid, take up then solid space)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for teeth)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(liquid, take up then solid space) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for us)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(soft drink, be bad for body)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(soft drink, be bad for body)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(soft drink, be bad for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(liquid, take up then solid space)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad for teeth)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(soft drink, be bad for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(liquid, take up then solid space)