bottled water: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
is quality 0.87
be bad for environment 0.80
go bad 0.79
be good for environment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drinking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bottle, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beverage, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(bottle, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bottle, be bad for environment)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, be bad for environment)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drinking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bottle, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(glass bottle, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, be bad for environment)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, is quality)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is quality)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bottled water, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be good for environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bottle, be bad for environment)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(glass bottle, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(glass bottle, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bottle, be bad for environment)