bottled water: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality good 0.94
has quality bad 0.90
is quality 0.89
have best 0.79
be good for environment 0.77
seem to taste better than tap 0.77
is best 0.76
is healthier 0.76
be better than tap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drinking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drinking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, is quality)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, is quality)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is quality)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, have best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, have best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bottled water, seem to taste better than tap)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(bottled water, seem to taste better than tap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is best)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(bottled water, seem to taste better than tap)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(bottled water, be better than tap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bottled water, is healthier)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(bottled water, be better than tap)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(bottled water, is healthier)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, have best)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be better than tap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is best)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is healthier)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is healthier)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be good for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be better than tap)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, seem to taste better than tap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(glass bottle, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(bottled water, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality bad)