bottled water: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
have best 0.97
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is best)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, have best)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, have best)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, have best)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(glass bottle, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 1.00
Typical(bottled water, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)