bottled water: have best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have best 1.00
is best 0.97
has quality better 0.79
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, have best)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, have best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(drinking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, have best)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, have best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(glass bottle, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, have best)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(bottled water, is best)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bottled water, is best)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bottled water, is best)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality better)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bottled water, have best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(glass bottle, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(bottled water, have best)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality good)