bottled water: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drinking water
Weight: 0.78
, soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.74
, bottle
Weight: 0.68
, drinking
Weight: 0.66
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.39
, glass bottle
Weight: 0.37
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, wine bottle
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
has quality bad 0.79
be bad for environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drinking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bottle, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beverage, go bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(bottle, be bad for environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(drinking, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(beverage, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bottle, be bad for environment)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(drinking, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(glass bottle, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(drinking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(beverage, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bottle, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(beverage, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bottled water, go bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(carbonated beverage, go bad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(glass bottle, be bad for environment)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(glass bottle, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(bottled water, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(bottled water, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, be bad for environment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(bottled water, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bottle, be bad for environment)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(carbonated beverage, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(glass bottle, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(beverage, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(drinking, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(bottled water, go bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(bottle, be bad for environment)