coca cola: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
taste good 0.79
be good company work for 0.78
be good company work 0.77
taste different lately 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(soft drink, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(soft drink, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(chocolate milk, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(coca cola, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(coca cola, taste different lately)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coca cola, taste different lately)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coca cola, taste different lately)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, taste different lately)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cola, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, taste good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cola, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(soft drink, taste good)