coca cola: be good company work for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.74
, beverage
Weight: 0.73
, cola
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.38
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.37
, soda
Weight: 0.36
, chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, soda pop
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good company work for 1.00
be good company work 0.99
is bad company 0.91
need company 0.88
is company 0.87
has state company 0.84
need global company 0.81
is global company 0.80
is business 0.78
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good company work for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(cola, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(cola, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(coca cola, be good company work for)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(coca cola, is bad company)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(coca cola, is bad company)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is bad company)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coca cola, need global company)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(coca cola, need global company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(coca cola, is global company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(coca cola, is global company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(coca cola, need global company)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(coca cola, has quality good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(coca cola, is global company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is bad company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, is global company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, need global company)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(coca cola, be good company work for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cola, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(coca cola, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cola, has quality good)