diet coke: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
has quality worse 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality change)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soda, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality change)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality change)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(coca cola, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(coca cola, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(chocolate milk, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soda, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(soda, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality worse)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(coca cola, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(soda, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(diet coke, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)