diet coke: be bad on keto

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.71
, drink
Weight: 0.69
, diet
Weight: 0.69
, product
Weight: 0.65
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.36
, coca cola
Weight: 0.36
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.36
, soda
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad on keto 1.00
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad on keto)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(diet coke, be bad on keto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(diet coke, be bad on keto)

Similarity expansion

0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(diet coke, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(diet coke, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad on keto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(diet coke, be bad on keto)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(diet coke, be bad on keto) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)