apple juice: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents juice
Weight: 0.79
, drink
Weight: 0.74
, fruit
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, soft drink
Weight: 0.69
Siblings tomato juice
Weight: 0.43
, carrot juice
Weight: 0.42
, grape juice
Weight: 0.42
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.42
, lime juice
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality good 0.91
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(soft drink, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(juice, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(soft drink, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(drink, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(juice, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(carrot juice, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grape juice, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(soft drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(drink, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(soft drink, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple juice, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(carrot juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(carrot juice, is quality)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(grape juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grape juice, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tomato juice, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato juice, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(apple juice, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(apple juice, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality good)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(apple juice, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(juice, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(carrot juice, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grape juice, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato juice, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(drink, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(juice, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(soft drink, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(apple juice, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)