dessert: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good for 0.86
has shape solid 0.79
taste good 0.79
is best 0.76
is damn good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sandwich, is damn good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(sandwich, is damn good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, is damn good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(custard, has shape solid)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, is best)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(flan, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(sandwich, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(sandwich, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(sandwich, is damn good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(flan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(flan, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is good for)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(custard, has shape solid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(custard, has shape solid)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(apple pie, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple pie, is best)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dessert, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(dessert, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(dessert, taste good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dessert, is best)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dessert, is best)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sandwich, is damn good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(flan, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(custard, has shape solid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is good for)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple pie, is best)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sandwich, is damn good)