fruit salad: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents salad
Weight: 0.77
, dish
Weight: 0.75
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.72
, dessert
Weight: 0.60
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.43
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.39
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.39
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.39
, cherry tomato
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good for 0.86
taste good 0.79
is good healthy food 0.79
is good food 0.78
has quality evil 0.78
is best 0.76
be bad company work for 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(salad, is good healthy food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, has quality better)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(fresh fruit, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fruit salad, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has quality better)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
...