salad: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meal
Weight: 0.71
, accompaniment
Weight: 0.70
, entree
Weight: 0.69
, dish
Weight: 0.64
Siblings potato salad
Weight: 0.82
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.77
, potato
Weight: 0.67
, taco
Weight: 0.65
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
is good for 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
be associated with bad quality 0.81
be good for health 0.80
were great 0.79
taste good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(potato, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(potato, taste good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(meal, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(potato, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(potato, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(potato, taste good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(potato, taste good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(salad, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(salad, taste good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(salad, taste good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(salad, taste good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(salad, taste good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(potato, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(potato, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)