meal: is good for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.66
, event
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
, accommodation
Weight: 0.59
Siblings soup
Weight: 0.73
, hamburger
Weight: 0.71
, salad
Weight: 0.71
, brunch
Weight: 0.69
, breakfast
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good for 1.00
has quality good 0.86
has quality bad 0.82
has physical part quick 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dessert, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(dessert, has physical part quick)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has physical part quick)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has physical part quick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(soup, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(dessert, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(breakfast, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(breakfast, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(salad, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(soup, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(soup, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(hamburger, has physical part quick) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has physical part quick)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(hamburger, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hamburger, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(meal, is good for)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(meal, has quality bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(meal, has physical part quick)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(meal, has physical part quick)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meal, has physical part quick)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(meal, has physical part quick)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(meal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dessert, has physical part quick)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(hamburger, has physical part quick)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(breakfast, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(salad, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(soup, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(hamburger, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(dessert, has physical part quick)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)