accommodation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents space
Weight: 0.59
, preparation
Weight: 0.59
, treatment
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings cottage
Weight: 0.62
, villa
Weight: 0.61
, cabin
Weight: 0.60
, lodging
Weight: 0.59
, meal
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality wrong 0.87
quality 0.86
is good for 0.82
has quality questions 0.75
is 3 bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(preparation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(space, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(space, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(preparation, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(space, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(preparation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(space, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(preparation, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(meal, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(meal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(accommodation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, quality)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(accommodation, quality)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(space, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(meal, is good for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(space, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(accommodation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(preparation, has quality questions)