accommodation: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	space Weight: 0.59 , preparation Weight: 0.59 , treatment Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.55
Siblings	cottage Weight: 0.62 , villa Weight: 0.61 , cabin Weight: 0.60 , lodging Weight: 0.59 , meal Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
quality	0.89
is good for	0.86
has quality wrong	0.85
has quality questions	0.76
is good game	0.76
be just as important as positive space	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(preparation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(space, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(preparation, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(space, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(preparation, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(preparation, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(space, has quality good)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(preparation, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(meal, is good for)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(meal, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(preparation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(space, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Plausible(preparation, has quality questions) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(meal, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(meal, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

Remarkable(meal, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(meal, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(meal, has quality wrong) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(meal, has quality wrong)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(meal, is good for) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(meal, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(accommodation, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Salient(accommodation, has quality bad)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality bad)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(accommodation, has quality bad)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Salient(accommodation, quality)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, quality)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality bad)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(accommodation, quality)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(accommodation, quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(accommodation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(space, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(preparation, has quality questions)

0.15

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(preparation, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(meal, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(meal, has quality wrong)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Typical(meal, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(meal, is good for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(space, has quality good)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(preparation, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.56

Typical(accommodation, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(preparation, has quality questions)