dessert: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit salad
Weight: 0.75
, recipe
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.63
, entree
Weight: 0.61
Siblings tiramisu
Weight: 0.84
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.79
, flan
Weight: 0.79
, custard
Weight: 0.76
, apple pie
Weight: 0.75

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
is good for 0.80
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fruit salad, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, is best)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(flan, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(sandwich, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dessert, is best)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(fruit salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dessert, is best)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(apple pie, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(apple pie, is best)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is good for)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(flan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(flan, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(apple pie, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(apple pie, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(dessert, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(dessert, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(flan, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(apple pie, is best)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is good for)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(apple pie, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(sandwich, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(dessert, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(fruit salad, has quality good)