blank: be considered better peanut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, character
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
, symbol
Weight: 0.48
Siblings picture frame
Weight: 0.31
, empty set
Weight: 0.31
, bullet
Weight: 0.31
, time out
Weight: 0.31
, pressure point
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered better peanut 1.00
be considered better then peanut 0.98
be considered peanut 0.98
be considered then peanut 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(blank, be considered better peanut)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered peanut)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(blank, be considered peanut)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered better then peanut)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(blank, be considered better then peanut)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(blank, be considered peanut)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(blank, be considered better then peanut)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(blank, be considered peanut)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(blank, be considered better then peanut)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered better peanut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(blank, be considered better peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(blank, be considered better peanut)