blank: be considered peanut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.56
, character
Weight: 0.53
, name
Weight: 0.51
, symbol
Weight: 0.48
Siblings picture frame
Weight: 0.31
, empty set
Weight: 0.31
, bullet
Weight: 0.31
, time out
Weight: 0.31
, pressure point
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered peanut 1.00
be considered then peanut 0.98
be considered better peanut 0.98
be considered better then peanut 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(blank, be considered peanut)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(blank, be considered better peanut)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(blank, be considered better peanut)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered better peanut)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered better then peanut)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(blank, be considered better then peanut)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(blank, be considered better peanut)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(blank, be considered then peanut)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(blank, be considered better then peanut)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(blank, be considered better then peanut)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(blank, be considered peanut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(blank, be considered peanut) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(blank, be considered peanut)