blowfish: be at house

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents band
Weight: 0.55
, artist
Weight: 0.55
, act
Weight: 0.46
, celebrity
Weight: 0.41
, people
Weight: 0.40
Siblings drake
Weight: 0.31
, chef
Weight: 0.31
, ozzy osbourne
Weight: 0.31
, herring
Weight: 0.30
, gill
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at house 1.00
be associate with mansion 0.79
be at kitchen 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with mansion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at house)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(celebrity, be associate with mansion)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(celebrity, be associate with mansion)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(celebrity, be associate with mansion) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(blowfish, be at house)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(chef, be at kitchen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(chef, be at kitchen)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(blowfish, be at house)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at house)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(blowfish, be at house)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with mansion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(chef, be at kitchen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(blowfish, be at house) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(celebrity, be associate with mansion)