blue jay: play in montreal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.65
, dead bird
Weight: 0.59
, mouse
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings blue bird
Weight: 0.68
, jay
Weight: 0.38
, red fox
Weight: 0.36
, great blue heron
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
play in montreal 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(jay, play in montreal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(blue jay, play in montreal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(blue jay, play in montreal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(blue jay, play in montreal)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(jay, play in montreal)