blueberry: taste bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.70
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.70
, berry
Weight: 0.67
, fruit tree
Weight: 0.66
, fruit
Weight: 0.65
Siblings strawberry
Weight: 0.39
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, peach tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear tree
Weight: 0.38
, pear
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste bad 1.00
taste good 0.97
taste different 0.92
taste bitter 0.87
taste like dirt 0.82
has quality bad 0.80
taste better refrigerated cold 0.78
taste better refrigerated 0.78
enhance taste of champagne 0.77
be in bad mood 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(blueberry, taste bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(blueberry, taste bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(fruit, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pear tree, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(pear tree, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(blueberry, taste bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(blueberry, taste bitter)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(blueberry, taste bitter)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bitter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(blueberry, taste like dirt)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(blueberry, taste like dirt)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(blueberry, taste bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(pear tree, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(blueberry, taste bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality bad)