boa: is horrible company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snake
Weight: 0.65
, constrictor
Weight: 0.58
, bank
Weight: 0.56
, singer
Weight: 0.55
, company
Weight: 0.54
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.40
, python
Weight: 0.37
, anaconda
Weight: 0.34
, rattlesnake
Weight: 0.34
, copperhead
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is horrible company 1.00
is horrible 0.91
has state company 0.78
has quality bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boa, is horrible company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bank, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bank, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(copperhead, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(python, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(bank, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(boa, is horrible company)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(python, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(python, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(copperhead, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(copperhead, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(boa, is horrible company)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(boa, is horrible)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(boa, is horrible)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(boa, is horrible)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(boa, has state company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(boa, has state company)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(boa, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(boa, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(boa, has state company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(boa, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(boa, has state company)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(boa, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(boa, is horrible company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(copperhead, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(python, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(boa, is horrible company)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bank, has quality bad)