boat: be from lake michigan able

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents craft
Weight: 0.65
, vessel
Weight: 0.65
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.62
, vehicle
Weight: 0.62
Siblings canoe
Weight: 0.73
, cruise ship
Weight: 0.68
, kayak
Weight: 0.65
, ferry
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from lake michigan able 1.00
be from lake michigan 0.97
is lake 0.82
is ohio 0.79
be allowed on seattle 's pike place 0.78
were used on nile river 0.77
be on lakes 0.76
be cheaper in florida 0.76
were used on river 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canoe, is lake)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canoe, is lake)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(canoe, is lake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(boat, be from lake michigan able)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(boat, were used on river)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boat, were used on nile river)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(boat, be on lakes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(boat, were used on river)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(boat, be on lakes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(boat, be on lakes)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(boat, be on lakes)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(boat, were used on nile river)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(boat, were used on river)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(boat, were used on nile river)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(boat, were used on nile river)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(boat, were used on river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(canoe, is lake)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(boat, be from lake michigan able)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(vehicle, be cheaper in florida)