boat: were used on nile river

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents craft
Weight: 0.65
, vessel
Weight: 0.65
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.62
, vehicle
Weight: 0.62
Siblings canoe
Weight: 0.73
, cruise ship
Weight: 0.68
, kayak
Weight: 0.65
, ferry
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
were used on nile river 1.00
were used on river 0.95
is lake 0.83
be on lakes 0.80
being are driven into side of lake 0.80
be from lake michigan able 0.77
get left in middle of lakes 0.77
get in sea 0.77
traverse panama canal 0.77
be from lake michigan 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(canoe, is lake)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(canoe, is lake)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(canoe, is lake)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(boat, were used on nile river)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(boat, were used on river)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(boat, were used on river)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(boat, were used on river)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(boat, were used on river)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(boat, be from lake michigan able)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(boat, were used on nile river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(boat, were used on nile river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(boat, were used on nile river)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(canoe, is lake)