bobsledding: be judged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.48
, activity
Weight: 0.39
, winter
Weight: 0.38
Siblings snowboarding
Weight: 0.34
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.34
, skiing
Weight: 0.34
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.33
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be judged 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, be judged)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be judged)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(skiing, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(skiing, be judged)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(snowboarding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, be judged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(bobsledding, be judged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(bobsledding, be judged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(snowboarding, be judged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skiing, be judged)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bobsledding, be judged) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cross country skiing, be judged)