bomber: be very expensive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents terrorist
Weight: 0.54
, plane
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, aircraft
Weight: 0.50
, people
Weight: 0.50
Siblings backfire
Weight: 0.36
, jet plane
Weight: 0.33
, atomic bomb
Weight: 0.32
, helicopter
Weight: 0.31
, fighter
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very expensive 1.00
be more expensive than car 0.86
be more attractive when they be small 0.79
be useless but still enjoyable 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bomber, be very expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bomber, be very expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than car)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(helicopter, be more expensive than car)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(helicopter, be more expensive than car)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(bomber, be very expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bomber, be very expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(helicopter, be more expensive than car)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(bomber, be very expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(thing, be useless but still enjoyable)