thing: be more attractive when they be small

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.66
, element
Weight: 0.65
, everything
Weight: 0.65
, reason
Weight: 0.64
Siblings think
Weight: 0.77
, remember
Weight: 0.74
, dark matter
Weight: 0.72
, what
Weight: 0.70
, irony
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more attractive when they be small 1.00
look small than thing nearby 0.83
look close than they be 0.82
be intricate if you look close enough 0.78
requires find something to think about 0.77
please you more than these flower 0.77
be motivated by be able to do it again 0.76
matter more than that 0.76
be motivated by you need that information 0.76
requires know something first 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(everything, be intricate if you look close enough)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(everything, be intricate if you look close enough)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(everything, be intricate if you look close enough)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(what, please you more than these flower)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(what, matter more than that)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(everything, be intricate if you look close enough)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(what, please you more than these flower)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(what, please you more than these flower)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(what, matter more than that)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(what, matter more than that)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(thing, look close than they be)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(thing, look small than thing nearby)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(thing, look close than they be)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(thing, look close than they be)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(thing, look close than they be)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(everything, be intricate if you look close enough)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by you need that information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(remember, be motivated by be able to do it again)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(what, matter more than that)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(what, please you more than these flower)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(thing, be more attractive when they be small)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(everything, be intricate if you look close enough)