bonus: get taxed at 40

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prize
Weight: 0.64
, sum
Weight: 0.60
, promotion
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings score
Weight: 0.59
, ending
Weight: 0.45
, award
Weight: 0.33
, purse
Weight: 0.32
, swag
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
get taxed at 40 1.00
get taxed 0.99
be taxed at 50 0.99
be taxed at 45 0.99
be taxed at 40 0.99
get taxed more 0.98
be taxed 0.98
is taxed 0.97
is taxed more 0.97
be taxed us 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(prize, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(prize, is taxed)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(prize, is taxed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(bonus, get taxed at 40)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bonus, is taxed)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bonus, get taxed)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(bonus, be taxed us)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed at 40)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(prize, is taxed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bonus, get taxed at 40) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(prize, is taxed)