:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(bonus, be taxed us)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(bonus, get taxed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(bonus, is taxed)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(prize, is taxed)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(prize, is taxed)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bonus, is taxed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(bonus, get taxed)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(prize, is taxed)
⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(bonus, be taxed us)