book: was written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cookbook
Weight: 0.70
, good book
Weight: 0.69
, read
Weight: 0.63
, artifact
Weight: 0.63
Siblings reading book
Weight: 0.79
, phone book
Weight: 0.78
, blue book
Weight: 0.76
, math book
Weight: 0.74
, autobiography
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
was written 1.00
is written 0.97
be written 0.96
be written in order 0.85
is poorly written 0.82
be with two authors written 0.80
were written in ages 0.79
were first written during ages 0.77
be written in chapters 0.77
be arranged by same author 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(math book, is poorly written)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(autobiography, be written)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(autobiography, is written)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(math book, is written)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(math book, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(math book, is written)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(autobiography, is written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(autobiography, is written)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(autobiography, be written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(autobiography, be written)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(math book, is poorly written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(math book, is poorly written)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(book, was written)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(book, is written)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(book, is written)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(book, is written)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(book, be written in chapters)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(book, is written)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(book, be written in chapters)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(book, be written in chapters)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(book, be written in chapters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(book, was written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(math book, is written)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(autobiography, is written)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(autobiography, be written)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(book, was written) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(math book, is poorly written)